in the beginning

We know what you’re thinking.  They’re not really going to start at the very beginning, are they?   Yikes!!!   LOL, yes they are!  Because understanding what happened in the beginning will help us understand better where we are now, and more importantly, where we’re heading.  You know, it’s kind of funny that scientists and theologians alike strive to understand what happened “in the beginning”.  They just go about it in different ways.  Both have “faith”, but they have faith in different things.  What is Faith?  Faith is believing in something that you can’t see based on the evidence that you can see.

There are two different schools of thought on “in the beginning”.  In this “part 1” let’s start with the one that everyone has heard about, the Scientific theory.   We will try not to be too detailed or boring going over this.  We’re not scientists, but we have done some research on the subject.   Many Scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory, but of course, this has never been “seen” with the human eye.  These scientists are really taking a leap of faith.  This is also true with the theory of Evolution.  Oh, did we say that right?  Theory of evolution?  We thought that Evolution was an UNCHANGEABLE, INDISPUTABLE fact??   Is it really?

We’re not gonna lie, this is a tough subject to cover.   It’s important to give you true information, but also important not to be so detailed that we lose you!  Also, this may be considered controversial.  What we’re going to tell you may not be popular with some, and others may straight up laugh, but it’s the honest to God truth.

So here goes…..Did you know that not ALL Scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory OR  the Theory of Evolution?  Yes, it’s still a theory, even though schools and institutions now teach it as an indisputable fact.   Did you know that some very, very smart scientists with lots of “letters” following their names (like PHD) have a DIFFERENT theory?  They call these Scientists Creationists, or Scientists who subscribe to the theory of  “Intelligent Design”.  These Scientists BELIEVE that the evidence that we see with our eyes absolutely DEMANDS an intelligent designer, and CANNOT be random.  This knowledge must be so dangerous, so “forbidden” that it is absolutely NOT ALLOWED to be taught in the public school system, even as a theory!!!  We will discuss it here.  😀

We’re not Scientists and we can’t go into a lengthy debate between Creation vs Evolution, but what we can do is just give you a little food for thought.  If what you read here gets you thinking, or makes you want to dig more into the truth, there is a plethora of easily accessible information available to you on the internet.  At this point you may be asking… what’s it matter anyway? (sounds oddly familiar).  Actually, it DOES matter.  How we got our start on planet earth matters very much.  Remember we told you in a  previous post that there is an enemy out there who seeks our destruction?  The devil really, really, REALLY doesn’t want you to know how everything got started, where you REALLY came from, because if you did, you would KNOW that God is real!   This is the true reason why Intelligent Design will NOT be taught in the public schools.  For some of you, that may sound a little crazy; however, we assure you, it’s the truth.  The Bible calls the devil “the prince of the power of the air”.  Believe it or not, this entity has a lot of control over leaders, nations, and world systems…for now.

Okay, here goes.  First, let’s start with the Big Bang THEORY.  The originators—George Lemaitre, a Belgium, struck on the basic idea in 1927; and George Gamow, R.A. Alpher, and R. Herman devised the basic Big Bang model in 1948.  According to the Big Bang theory, all matter and all space was originally part of an infinitesimally small point called the Singularity. The theory says nothing about where that singularity came from. It is assumed to have come about by a random quantum event.

Quantum theory also holds that a vacuum, like atoms, is subject to quantum uncertainties.  This means that things can materialize out of the vacuum, although they tend to vanish back into it quickly. this phenomenon has never been observed directly 2

Translated into English… “things appear from nothing and then disappear back into nothing. And nobody has ever seen any of that happen!”.   

These Scientists hypothesize that about 14 – 16 BILLION years ago NOTHING at all existed.  And out of that “nothingness” (aka Singularity) there was a “big bang” (explosion) and everything in the Universe that now exists was formed.   This includes all matter and anti-matter.  No more matter is being created.   Besides not knowing what would cause the “singularity”, there’s another problem with this theory.   The original Big Bang would have produced equal amounts of positive matter (matter) and negative matter (antimatter). But only small amounts of antimatter exist. There should be as much antimatter as matter – if the Big Bang was true.

In fact, there isn’t enough matter of any sort for their calculations. For this reason, the concept of dark matter has been postulated. Dark matter is matter that cannot be detected, but it must be there, otherwise their calculations do not work! They have a similar problem with not enough energy in the Universe, so they have developed the idea of dark energy. 

One more big problem with the Big Bang Theory involves the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

2nd LAW of THERMODYNAMICS….This proven scientific LAW states that “the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time.The total entropy can remain constant in ideal cases where the system is in a steady state  (equilibrium),  In all spontaneous processes, the total entropy increases and the process is IRREVERSIBLE.  

“In fact, all we have to do is nothing and everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out all by itself. And this is what the 2nd law is all about”  Smithsonian Institute Journal

Entropy is defined as a “gradual decline into disorder”  What does this mean?  It means that you can’t have something like a GIGANTIC EXPLOSION and out of this CHAOS…form an ORDERLY UNIVERSE with Galaxies, Solar Systems, Planets, and eventually…LIFE!  In-fact, the opposite would be true.  The 2nd law of Thermodynamics tells us that ALL matter in the universe would be continually move towards entropy (disorganization/chaos) and not towards more and more order. The Big Bang Theory does not stand up to the PROVEN laws of SCIENCE!!!  

Radio Astronomy PROVES that the Big Bang Theory is DEAD!  In the 1980’s Professor Herouni from Armenia discovered through the use of the Herouni Antenna that there was no BIG BANG SIGNAL.  After the break up of the Soviet Union, Professor Herouni published this data in a Greek Journal in 1999. “That publication could no longer be found in the journal archives.  Still, the editor in Chief of the Journal, Professor Nicolas Uzunoglu, had initially invited Professor Herouni to send his findings to him.  We were finally able to find a hard copy of the paper in a library in Armenia, OTHERWISE the paper would have disappeared from the face of the earth!”   

This important information DISPROVING the Big Bang Theory has been purposely “lost” and suppressed.

You still with us?  Have we lost you yet??  Let’s now quickly look at the THEORY of Evolution…  Scientists HYPOTHESIZE that FIRST there was a primordial ooze BILLIONS of years ago on planet earth (Earth was covered in water and “other stuff”). And from this soup, or primordial mix, the elements of life were present..and life just SPONTANEOUSLY ERUPTED. Again, defying the laws of nature by stating that order can develop out of chaos.  But, it gets even more interesting.

The MIND-BLOWING information we’re about to give you COMPLETELY debunks the “warm pond theory” that states life just randomly, spontaneously sprung up out a primordial ooze. The “warm pond theory” is the backbone of evolution.  If there’s no warm pond theory, then there’s no evolution.  This is NOT something that you will be taught in school because, again, public INSTITUTIONS SUPPRESS THE TRUTH!!!

A Harvard biologist published a paper three weeks ago recanting a previous article and admitting that his preconceived beliefs led him to faulty conclusions, leaving him with a gaping hole in his findings that current evolutionary theories simply cannot explain.

In a 2016 paper published in Nature Chemistry, Jack Szostak, a Nobel Prize laureate and Professor of Genetics at Harvard Medical School, made a discovery he labeled a “synthetic tour de force”. He claimed that he had discovered a way for ribonucleic acid (RNA) to replicate itself. His discovery was a powerful proof for the evolutionary model of the beginning of life.

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) is necessary for the production of enzymes so it is an essential element for all forms of lifeEvolutionary theory states that RNA was among the first molecules to develop and that RNA had to exist for life to exist. RNA, as it is found in cells today, is a complex and unstable molecule requiring its own enzymes to reproduceFor the first RNA to develop at a pre-biotic stage in world historyit would need to be self-reproducing, existing without these enzymes already in place.

It appears that the origins of life on earth are a bit more complicated than the researchers believed. Earlier this month, Tivoli Olsen, a colleague, tried to replicate Szostak’s results but could not. Szostak admitted that his results were inconclusive. (tfj: Did he LIE?)

“In retrospect, we were totally blinded by our belief [in our findings] … we were not as careful or rigorous as we should have been (and as Tivoli was) in interpreting these experiments,” Szostak told Retraction Watch.

Without being able to produce RNA in the laboratory in the absence of the necessary enzymesthe ‘warm little pond’ theory of the origin of life does not work. The chemical processes produced in the lab did not, in fact, produce the building blocks necessary for life.

“Although we are disappointed that that approach does not work, we are going back to the drawing board and looking into other ways of overcoming this roadblock,” Szotak said.

Dr. Gerald Schroeder, an Orthodox Jewish physicist, explained the difficulties presented by the RNA puzzle for the evolutionary theory of the origins of life.

“RNA is phenomenally unstable and it would not last long enough for the myriad of possible chance interactions of molecules to produce similar to life and cells,” Dr. Schroeder told Breaking Israel News. “The RNA would be long gone. DNA is the genetic library but RNA is the workhorse that makes life possible.”

What the Article above is stating is that the enzyme NECESSARY to produce LIFE…is not stable and is not self-replicating.  This enzyme can only be found in PRE-EXISTING LIFE.  This means that LIFE would be required to produce the ENZYME that helps produce LIFE.  Basically…LIFE CAME FIRST!   No life…No Enzyme…No life!  Which came first, the chicken or the egg?  THE CHICKEN!   There is no such thing as Evolution.  Yes, there is ADAPTATION (aka micro-evolution) among species, but animals (and humans ) DO NOT jump species.  Adaptation is the ONLY  “type” of “evolution” that has EVER been observed!  If you’re still not convinced, check out the fruit fly experiments! 

This year is the one hundredth anniversary of an article in Science magazine that identified the fruit fly as an excellent subject for studies in character inheritance and the process of evolution. The fruit fly has a normal life span of just 30 days – and even this can be reduced by varying the ambient temperature.

However, despite the experiments and 100 years of opportunity, no evidence has been demonstrated of evolution. Although mutations can be induced by intelligent manipulation, after all the experiments into the potential mechanisms of evolution the resulting fruit flies were either dead, unchanged or monstersbut always still fruit flies.

Now you know the truth, and the truth will set you FREE!

Stay tuned!!  It’s going to get much more interesting from here.    Next (part 2) we will look at what REALLY DID HAPPEN…”IN THE BEGINNING”..